Compare skills
Pick 2–4 skills and compare what really matters: fit, risk, install effort, and community signal.
Comparison matrix
Highlights show current best; tooltip explains diff/best rules.
Score-basis diff rules / risk tag notes
Start with the matrix. Open this section when you need to understand audit grades, top threats, control gaps, and best-value highlights.
Suggested baseline
Search to add skills, or paste 2–4 comma-separated slugs.
How differences are detected
A row is marked different when selected skills have distinct values. Only-differences mode hides rows that are identical.
How best values are highlighted
Pre-install score, evidence completeness, and community signal prefer higher values; execution risk and install friction prefer lower values.
How to read risk tags
Risk tags come from SAS-v2.1 public-evidence signals and point to command, network, secret, context, or supply-chain items to review before install.
Selected audit signals
textgen
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
opencode
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
Graveyard Protocol CLI
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, identity privilege abuse, data exfiltration
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
| Dimension | textgen | opencode | Graveyard Protocol CLI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-install decision | |||
Pre-install score | 92 · Manual review | 92 · Manual review | 85 · Manual review |
Score basis | Clear source, High execution risk, Universal | Clear source, High execution risk, Universal | Clear source, High execution risk, OpenClaw |
Threat tags | unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap | unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap | unexpected code execution, identity privilege abuse, data exfiltration |
Permission summary | Permission review, Network, Command | Permission review, Network, Command | Permission review, Network, Secrets, Command |
Evidence completeness | 65% | 65% | 67% |
| Source & provenance | |||
Provenance | oobabooga/textgen | anomalyco/opencode | openclaw/skills |
Category | Agent & Tools | Agent & Tools | Dev & Engineering |
Freshness | |||
| Risk & permission signals | |||
Audit signals | metadata-only | metadata-only | needs credentials, network access, runs shell, writes files |
Permission hints | repository clone | repository clone | requires binary: node, requires binary: npx, requires binary: gp-cli, verify source provenance before install |
| Install & compatibility | |||
Supported tools | Universal | Universal | OpenClaw |
Install friction | 75 | 75 | 65 |
| Community | |||
Stars | 46.5K | 142.8K | 0 |
Repository: Langchain-Chatchat
Author: chatchat-space · Source status: Clear source
Langchain-Chatchat（原Langchain-ChatGLM）基于 Langchain 与 ChatGLM, Qwen 与 Llama 等语言模型的 RAG 与 Agent 应用 | Langchain-Chatchat (formerly langchain-ChatGLM), local knowledge based LLM (like ChatGLM, Qwen and Llama) RAG and Agent…
Score basis：Clear source · High execution risk · Universal · Evidence completeness 67%
Repository: pi-mono
Author: badlogic · Source status: Clear source
AI agent toolkit: coding agent CLI, unified LLM API, TUI & web UI libraries, Slack bot, vLLM pods
Score basis：Clear source · High execution risk · Universal · Evidence completeness 67%
Repository: 1Panel
Author: 1Panel-dev · Source status: Clear source
🔥 1Panel is a modern, open-source VPS control panel — and the only one with native AI agent support.
Score basis：Clear source · High execution risk · Universal · Evidence completeness 65%
Repository: firecrawl
Author: firecrawl · Source status: Clear source
🔥 The Web Data API for AI - Power AI agents with clean web data
Score basis：Clear source · High execution risk · Universal · Evidence completeness 67%
2026-04-14 |
2026-04-14 |
2026-03-31 |
