Compare skills
Pick 2–4 skills and compare what really matters: fit, risk, install effort, and community signal.
Comparison matrix
Highlights show current best; tooltip explains diff/best rules.
SAS-v2.1 diff rules / risk tag notes
Start with the matrix. Open this section when you need to understand audit grades, top threats, control gaps, and best-value highlights.
Suggested baseline
Repository: lobehub
Author: lobehub · Source status: Clear source
The ultimate space for work and life — to find, build, and collaborate with agent teammates that grow with you.
Score basis：Clear source · Risk needs review · Universal
Search to add skills, or paste 2–4 comma-separated slugs.
How differences are detected
A row is marked different when selected skills have distinct values. Only-differences mode hides rows that are identical.
How best values are highlighted
Audit score, evidence confidence, trust score, and community signal prefer higher values; execution risk and install friction prefer lower values.
How to read risk tags
Risk tags come from SAS-v2.1 public-evidence signals and point to command, network, secret, context, or supply-chain items to review before install.
Selected audit signals
SentrySkills
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
ragflow
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, memory context poisoning
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
ansible
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
| Dimension | SentrySkills | ragflow | ansible |
|---|---|---|---|
| SAS-v2.1 pre-install audit | |||
Threat tags | unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap | unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, memory context poisoning | unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap |
Evidence confidence | 65% | 67% | 65% |
| Source & provenance | |||
Provenance | AI45Lab/SentrySkills | infiniflow/ragflow | ansible/ansible |
Freshness | 2026-04-10 | 2026-04-14 | 2026-04-14 |
| Risk & trust | |||
Trust score | 63 | 92 | 92 |
| Community | |||
Stars | 8 | 78K | 68.4K |
Repository: goose
Author: aaif-goose · Source status: Clear source
an open source, extensible AI agent that goes beyond code suggestions - install, execute, edit, and test with any LLM
Score basis：Clear source · Risk needs review · Universal
Repository: Open-Assistant
Author: LAION-AI · Source status: Clear source
OpenAssistant is a chat-based assistant that understands tasks, can interact with third-party systems, and retrieve information dynamically to do so.
Score basis：Clear source · Risk needs review · Universal
Repository: composio
Author: ComposioHQ · Source status: Clear source
Composio powers 1000+ toolkits, tool search, context management, authentication, and a sandboxed workbench to help you build AI agents that turn intent into action.
Score basis：Clear source · Risk needs review · Universal
