Compare skills
Pick 2–4 skills and compare what really matters: fit, risk, install effort, and community signal.
Comparison matrix
Highlights show current best; tooltip explains diff/best rules.
Score-basis diff rules / risk tag notes
Start with the matrix. Open this section when you need to understand audit grades, top threats, control gaps, and best-value highlights.
Suggested baseline
Repository: openai/skills
Author: openai · Source status: Clear source
Analyze git repositories to build a security ownership topology (people-to-file), compute bus factor and sensitive-code ownership, and export CSV/JSON for graph databases and visualization.
Score basis：Clear source · High execution risk · Claude · Evidence completeness 67%
Search to add skills, or paste 2–4 comma-separated slugs.
How differences are detected
A row is marked different when selected skills have distinct values. Only-differences mode hides rows that are identical.
How best values are highlighted
Pre-install score, evidence completeness, and community signal prefer higher values; execution risk and install friction prefer lower values.
How to read risk tags
Risk tags come from SAS-v2.1 public-evidence signals and point to command, network, secret, context, or supply-chain items to review before install.
Selected audit signals
git-commit
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
n8n-install
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, memory context poisoning
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
fossology
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap
Control gaps：broad permissions, shell without guardrails, network without allowlist
| Dimension | git-commit | n8n-install | fossology |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-install decision | |||
Pre-install score | 79 · Manual review | 79 · Manual review | 81 · Manual review |
Score basis | Clear source, High execution risk, Claude | Clear source, High execution risk, Universal | Clear source, High execution risk, Universal |
Threat tags | unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap | unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, memory context poisoning | unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap |
Control gaps | missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails | missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails | broad permissions, shell without guardrails, network without allowlist |
Evidence completeness | 65% | 67% | 67% |
| Source & provenance | |||
Provenance | github/awesome-copilot/tree/main/skills/git-commit | kossakovsky/n8n-install | fossology/fossology |
Freshness | 2026-02-04 | 2026-03-29 | 2026-04-06 |
| Risk & permission signals | |||
Audit signals | runs shell, writes files | network access, runs shell | network access, runs shell |
Permission hints | registry access, remote metadata pull, runtime dependencies may be required | repository clone, local runtime dependencies | repository clone, local runtime dependencies |
| Install & compatibility | |||
Supported tools | Claude, Codex, Cursor, Universal | Universal | Universal |
Install method | registry-install | script-backed | script-backed |
Install friction | |||
| Community | |||
Stars | 20.6K | 795 | 980 |
Repository: openclaw/skills
Author: landoyjx · Source status: Clear source
Automatically execute tasks from checklist.md with state management and scheduled checking
Score basis：Clear source · High execution risk · Claude · Evidence completeness 67%
Repository: openclaw/skills
Author: tenequm · Source status: Clear source
Convert documentation, GitHub repos, PDFs, codebases, videos, and more into structured AI skills using the skill-seekers CLI.
Score basis：Clear source · High execution risk · Claude · Evidence completeness 71%
Repository: accessibility-scanner
Author: github · Source status: Clear source
Finds potential accessibility gaps, files GitHub issues to track them, and attempts to fix them with Copilot.
Score basis：Clear source · High execution risk · Universal · Evidence completeness 65%
60 |
50 |
50 |
