Compare skills
Pick 2–4 skills and compare what really matters: fit, risk, install effort, and community signal.
Comparison matrix
Highlights show current best; tooltip explains diff/best rules.
SAS-v2.1 diff rules / risk tag notes
Start with the matrix. Open this section when you need to understand audit grades, top threats, control gaps, and best-value highlights.
innoshop
innocommerce/innoshop · Score 81
Search to add skills, or paste 2–4 comma-separated slugs.
How differences are detected
A row is marked different when selected skills have distinct values. Only-differences mode hides rows that are identical.
How best values are highlighted
Audit score, evidence confidence, trust score, and community signal prefer higher values; execution risk and install friction prefer lower values.
How to read risk tags
Risk tags come from SAS-v2.1 public-evidence signals and point to command, network, secret, context, or supply-chain items to review before install.
Selected audit signals
fossology
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap
Control gaps：broad permissions, shell without guardrails, network without allowlist
gram
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
Auto Respawn
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, identity privilege abuse, data exfiltration
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
innoshop
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
| Dimension | fossology | gram | Auto Respawn | innoshop |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SAS-v2.1 pre-install audit | ||||
Audit grade | C · Review first | C · Review first | D · Limited evidence | C · Review first |
Threat tags | unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap | unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap | unexpected code execution, identity privilege abuse, data exfiltration | unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap |
Control gaps | broad permissions, shell without guardrails, network without allowlist | missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails | missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails | missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails |
Permission summary | Permission review, Network, Command | Permission review, Network, Command | Permission review, Network, Secrets, Command | Permission review, Network, Command |
Evidence confidence | 67% | 65% | 69% | 65% |
| Source & provenance | ||||
Provenance | fossology/fossology | speakeasy-api/gram | openclaw/skills | innocommerce/innoshop |
Category | Operations & Infra | Dev & Engineering | Operations & Infra | Operations & Infra |
Freshness | ||||
| Risk & trust | ||||
Trust score | 81 | 82 | 82 | 81 |
Audit signals | network access, runs shell | No explicit signals | ||
| Install & compatibility | ||||
Supported tools | Universal | Universal | Claude, OpenClaw | Universal |
Install friction | 50 | 40 | ||
| Community | ||||
Stars | 980 | 226 | 0 | 609 |
2026-04-06 |
2026-04-08 |
2026-02-28 |
2026-04-06 |
No explicit signals |
Permission hints | repository clone, local runtime dependencies | repository clone, local runtime dependencies | verify source provenance before install | repository clone, local runtime dependencies |
|---|
40 |
