Compare skills
Pick 2–4 skills and compare what really matters: fit, risk, install effort, and community signal.
Comparison matrix
Highlights show current best; tooltip explains diff/best rules.
SAS-v2.1 diff rules / risk tag notes
Start with the matrix. Open this section when you need to understand audit grades, top threats, control gaps, and best-value highlights.
Suggested baseline
Repository: mcp-sequentialthinking-tools
Author: spences10 · Source status: Clear source
🧠 An adaptation of the MCP Sequential Thinking Server to guide tool usage.
Score basis：Clear source · Low risk signals · Universal
Search to add skills, or paste 2–4 comma-separated slugs.
How differences are detected
A row is marked different when selected skills have distinct values. Only-differences mode hides rows that are identical.
How best values are highlighted
Audit score, evidence confidence, trust score, and community signal prefer higher values; execution risk and install friction prefer lower values.
How to read risk tags
Risk tags come from SAS-v2.1 public-evidence signals and point to command, network, secret, context, or supply-chain items to review before install.
Selected audit signals
Create-MCP
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, memory context poisoning
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
Proactive Ops Monitor
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, identity privilege abuse, data exfiltration
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
LibreChat
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
| Dimension | Create-MCP | Proactive Ops Monitor | LibreChat |
|---|---|---|---|
| SAS-v2.1 pre-install audit | |||
Threat tags | unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, memory context poisoning | unexpected code execution, identity privilege abuse, data exfiltration | unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap |
Permission summary | Permission review, Network, Command | Permission review, Network, Secrets, Command | Permission review, Network, Command |
Evidence confidence | 67% | 69% | 65% |
| Source & provenance | |||
Provenance | AnnieBabs/Create-MCP | openclaw/skills | danny-avila/LibreChat |
Category | Integrations & Connectors | Operations & Infra | Integrations & Connectors |
Freshness | |||
| Risk & trust | |||
Trust score | 82 | 85 | 81 |
Audit signals | No explicit signals | needs credentials, writes files | No explicit signals |
| Install & compatibility | |||
Supported tools | Universal | OpenClaw | Universal |
Install friction | 40 | 55 | 40 |
| Community | |||
Stars | 5 | 0 | 35.4K |
Repository: indonesia-gov-apis
Author: suryast · Source status: Clear source
🇮🇩 50+ Indonesian Government APIs & Data Sources — BPS, OJK, BPJPH, BPOM, Bank Indonesia, IDX, BMKG + MCP servers.
Score basis：Clear source · Low risk signals · Universal
Repository: mcp-mindmesh
Author: 7ossamfarid · Source status: Clear source
Claude 3.7 Swarm with Field Coherence: A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that orchestrates multiple specialized Claude 3.7 Sonnet instances in a quantum-inspired swarm.
Score basis：Clear source · Low risk signals · Universal
Repository: awesome-copilot
Author: github · Source status: Clear source
Generate complete Power Platform custom connector with MCP integration for Copilot Studio - includes schema generation, troubleshooting, and validation
Score basis：Clear source · Low risk signals · Claude
2026-04-09 |
2026-04-02 |
2026-04-08 |
Permission hints |
|---|
repository clone, local runtime dependencies |
verify source provenance before install |
repository clone, local runtime dependencies |
