Gram
Repository: gram
Author: speakeasy-api · Source status: Clear source
Securely scale AI usage across your organization.
Score basis:Clear source · High execution risk · Universal · Evidence completeness 65%
Compare skills
Pick 2–4 skills and compare what really matters: fit, risk, install effort, and community signal.
Comparison matrix
Highlights show current best; tooltip explains diff/best rules.
Score-basis diff rules / risk tag notes
Start with the matrix. Open this section when you need to understand audit grades, top threats, control gaps, and best-value highlights.
Suggested baseline
Search to add skills, or paste 2–4 comma-separated slugs.
How differences are detected
A row is marked different when selected skills have distinct values. Only-differences mode hides rows that are identical.
How best values are highlighted
Pre-install score, evidence completeness, and community signal prefer higher values; execution risk and install friction prefer lower values.
How to read risk tags
Risk tags come from SAS-v2.1 public-evidence signals and point to command, network, secret, context, or supply-chain items to review before install.
Selected audit signals
connect-sdk-go
Execution risk:High
Threat tags:unexpected code execution, identity privilege abuse, data exfiltration
Control gaps:missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
ccNexus
Execution risk:High
Threat tags:unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap
Control gaps:missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
inkbox
Execution risk:High
Threat tags:unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap
Control gaps:missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
| Dimension | connect-sdk-go | ccNexus | inkbox |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-install decision | |||
Pre-install score | 72 · Manual review | 82 · Manual review | 82 · Manual review |
Threat tags | unexpected code execution, identity privilege abuse, data exfiltration | unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap | unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap |
Permission summary | Permission review, Network, Secrets, Command | Permission review, Network, Command | Permission review, Network, Command |
Evidence completeness | 67% | 65% | 65% |
| Source & provenance | |||
Provenance | 1Password/connect-sdk-go | lich0821/ccNexus | inkbox-ai/inkbox |
Freshness | 2026-03-28 | 2026-03-23 | 2026-04-07 |
| Community | |||
Stars | 186 | 816 | 8 |
Repository: claude-ide-tools
Author: YousifAshwal · Source status: Clear source
🛠️ Enhance Claude Code CLI’s refactoring with JetBrains IDEs, leveraging advanced semantic analysis for smarter code usage handling.
Score basis:Clear source · High execution risk · Universal · Evidence completeness 67%
Repository: rox
Author: BeWelcome · Source status: Clear source
:earth_africa: BeWelcome lets you share a place to stay, connect with travellers, meet up and find accommodation on your journey.
Score basis:Clear source · High execution risk · Universal · Evidence completeness 65%
Repository: splitrail
Author: Piebald-AI · Source status: Clear source
Fast, cross-platform, real-time token usage tracker and cost monitor for Gemini CLI / Claude Code / Codex CLI / Qwen Code / Cline / Roo Code / Kilo Code / GitHub Copilot / OpenCode / Pi Agent / Piebald.
Score basis:Clear source · High execution risk · Universal · Evidence completeness 67%