Brain Bed
Repository: brain-bed
Author: bbangjooo · Source status: Clear source
Score 82Clear source
Manual reviewForced meditation breaks for AI-fried brains.
Score basis：Clear source · Low risk signals · Universal
Author unclaimed
Universal
3
Compare skills
Pick 2–4 skills and compare what really matters: fit, risk, install effort, and community signal.
Comparison matrix
Highlights show current best; tooltip explains diff/best rules.
SAS-v2.1 diff rules / risk tag notes
Start with the matrix. Open this section when you need to understand audit grades, top threats, control gaps, and best-value highlights.
Suggested baseline
Search to add skills, or paste 2–4 comma-separated slugs.
How differences are detected
A row is marked different when selected skills have distinct values. Only-differences mode hides rows that are identical.
How best values are highlighted
Audit score, evidence confidence, trust score, and community signal prefer higher values; execution risk and install friction prefer lower values.
How to read risk tags
Risk tags come from SAS-v2.1 public-evidence signals and point to command, network, secret, context, or supply-chain items to review before install.
Selected audit signals
codex-oss-maintainer-toolkit
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
ccNexus
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
mcp-for-beginners
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, memory context poisoning
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
| Dimension | codex-oss-maintainer-toolkit | ccNexus | mcp-for-beginners |
|---|---|---|---|
| SAS-v2.1 pre-install audit | |||
Threat tags | unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap | unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap | unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, memory context poisoning |
Evidence confidence | 65% | 65% | 67% |
| Source & provenance | |||
Provenance | IndianOldTurtledove/codex-oss-maintainer-toolkit | lich0821/ccNexus | microsoft/mcp-for-beginners |
Freshness | 2026-03-13 | 2026-03-23 | 2026-04-08 |
| Risk & trust | |||
Trust score | 74 | 82 | 85 |
| Community | |||
Stars | 45 | 816 | 15.8K |
Repository: rox
Author: BeWelcome · Source status: Clear source
:earth_africa: BeWelcome lets you share a place to stay, connect with travellers, meet up and find accommodation on your journey.
Score basis：Clear source · Low risk signals · Universal
Repository: splitrail
Author: Piebald-AI · Source status: Clear source
Fast, cross-platform, real-time token usage tracker and cost monitor for Gemini CLI / Claude Code / Codex CLI / Qwen Code / Cline / Roo Code / Kilo Code / GitHub Copilot / OpenCode / Pi Agent / Piebald.
Score basis：Clear source · Risk needs review · Universal
Repository: cc-statistics
Author: androidZzT · Source status: Clear source
AI Coding stats dashboard — track costs, tokens, and efficiency across Claude Code / Gemini CLI / Codex / Cursor Topics: ai-coding, claude-code, cli, cost-estimation, developer-tools, gemini-cli, macos-app, python, swift
Score basis：Clear source · Risk needs review · Universal