Trueline Mcp
Repository: trueline-mcp
Author: rjkaes · Source status: Clear source
Score 82Clear source
Manual reviewSmarter reads, safer edits.
Score basis：Clear source · Risk needs review · Universal
Author unclaimed
Universal
12
Compare skills
Pick 2–4 skills and compare what really matters: fit, risk, install effort, and community signal.
Comparison matrix
Highlights show current best; tooltip explains diff/best rules.
SAS-v2.1 diff rules / risk tag notes
Start with the matrix. Open this section when you need to understand audit grades, top threats, control gaps, and best-value highlights.
Suggested baseline
Search to add skills, or paste 2–4 comma-separated slugs.
How differences are detected
A row is marked different when selected skills have distinct values. Only-differences mode hides rows that are identical.
How best values are highlighted
Audit score, evidence confidence, trust score, and community signal prefer higher values; execution risk and install friction prefer lower values.
How to read risk tags
Risk tags come from SAS-v2.1 public-evidence signals and point to command, network, secret, context, or supply-chain items to review before install.
Selected audit signals
codex
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
ccNexus
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
splitrail
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, identity privilege abuse, data exfiltration
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
| Dimension | codex | ccNexus | splitrail |
|---|---|---|---|
| SAS-v2.1 pre-install audit | |||
Threat tags | unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap | unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap | unexpected code execution, identity privilege abuse, data exfiltration |
Permission summary | Permission review, Network, Command | Permission review, Network, Command | Permission review, Network, Secrets, Command |
Evidence confidence | 65% | 65% | 67% |
| Source & provenance | |||
Provenance | popjane/codex | lich0821/ccNexus | Piebald-AI/splitrail |
Freshness | 2025-11-27 | 2026-03-23 | 2026-04-06 |
| Risk & trust | |||
Trust score | 64 | 82 | 82 |
Audit signals | |||
| Install & compatibility | |||
Install friction | 40 | 40 | 55 |
| Community | |||
Stars | 9 | 816 | 150 |
Repository: free_chatgpt_api
Author: popjane · Source status: Clear source
🔥 公益免费的ChatGPT API，Free ChatGPT API，GPT4 API，可直连，无需代理，使用标准 OpenAI APIKEY 格式访问 ChatGPT，可搭配ChatGPT-next-web、ChatGPT-Midjourney、Lobe-chat、Botgem、FastGPT、Cherry Studio、沉浸式翻译等项目使用
Score basis：Clear source · Risk needs review · Universal
Repository: tokscale
Author: junhoyeo · Source status: Clear source
🛰️ A CLI tool for tracking token usage from OpenCode, Claude Code, 🦞OpenClaw (Clawdbot/Moltbot), Pi, Codex, Gemini, Cursor, AmpCode, Factory Droid, Kimi, and more!
Score basis：Clear source · Risk needs review · Universal
Repository: cc-statistics
Author: androidZzT · Source status: Clear source
AI Coding stats dashboard — track costs, tokens, and efficiency across Claude Code / Gemini CLI / Codex / Cursor Topics: ai-coding, claude-code, cli, cost-estimation, developer-tools, gemini-cli, macos-app, python, swift
Score basis：Clear source · Risk needs review · Universal
No explicit signals |
needs credentials |
Permission hints | repository clone, local runtime dependencies | repository clone, local runtime dependencies | local runtime dependencies, repository clone |
|---|