Compare skills
Pick 2–4 skills and compare what really matters: fit, risk, install effort, and community signal.
Comparison matrix
Highlights show current best; tooltip explains diff/best rules.
Score-basis diff rules / risk tag notes
Start with the matrix. Open this section when you need to understand audit grades, top threats, control gaps, and best-value highlights.
Suggested baseline
Repository: openclaw/skills
Author: keyikoi · Source status: Clear source
Embed interactive flight price trend charts into AI responses.
Score basis：Clear source · High execution risk · OpenClaw · Evidence completeness 67%
Search to add skills, or paste 2–4 comma-separated slugs.
How differences are detected
A row is marked different when selected skills have distinct values. Only-differences mode hides rows that are identical.
How best values are highlighted
Pre-install score, evidence completeness, and community signal prefer higher values; execution risk and install friction prefer lower values.
How to read risk tags
Risk tags come from SAS-v2.1 public-evidence signals and point to command, network, secret, context, or supply-chain items to review before install.
Selected audit signals
claude-token-tracker
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, identity privilege abuse, data exfiltration
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
BitNet
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
pathway
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, memory context poisoning
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
| Dimension | claude-token-tracker | BitNet | pathway |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-install decision | |||
Pre-install score | 61 · Manual review | 66 · Manual review | 65 · Manual review |
Threat tags | unexpected code execution, identity privilege abuse, data exfiltration | unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap | unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, memory context poisoning |
Permission summary | Permission review, Network, Secrets, Command | Permission review, Network, Command | Permission review, Network, Command |
Evidence completeness | 67% | 65% | 67% |
| Source & provenance | |||
Provenance | pepperonas/claude-token-tracker | microsoft/BitNet | pathwaycom/pathway |
Category | Data & Analytics | Automation & Workflows | Automation & Workflows |
Freshness | |||
| Risk & permission signals | |||
Audit signals | needs credentials | metadata-only | metadata-only |
Permission hints | repository clone, local runtime dependencies | repository clone | repository clone |
| Install & compatibility | |||
Install friction | 55 | 75 | 75 |
| Community | |||
Stars | 4 | 38.2K | 63.5K |
Repository: agents
Author: wshobson · Source status: Clear source
Database Migration skill from wshobson/agents.
Score basis：Clear source · High execution risk · Claude · Evidence completeness 65%
Repository: openclaw/skills
Author: zwd0313 · Source status: Clear source
Run Claude Code tasks in headless mode with `claude -p` through the local `cc-task-runner.sh` wrapper, including model switching, JSON output capture, structured schema checks, multi-file artifact validation, and glob ma
Score basis：Clear source · High execution risk · Claude · Evidence completeness 65%
Repository: research-workflow-assistant
Author: andre-inter-collab-llc · Source status: Clear source
Open-source AI research assistant for VS Code + GitHub Copilot.
Score basis：Clear source · High execution risk · Universal · Evidence completeness 65%
2026-04-06 |
2026-03-10 |
2026-04-14 |
