LookupMark File Sender
Repository: openclaw/skills
Author: lookupmark · Source status: Clear source
Find and send local files to a chat channel (Telegram, Discord, WhatsApp, Signal, Slack).
Score basis:Clear source · High risk signals · OpenClaw
Compare skills
Pick 2–4 skills and compare what really matters: fit, risk, install effort, and community signal.
Selected skills (2/4)
Comparison matrix
Highlights show current best; tooltip explains diff/best rules.
SAS-v2.1 diff rules / risk tag notes
Start with the matrix. Open this section when you need to understand audit grades, top threats, control gaps, and best-value highlights.
Suggested baseline
Repository: openclaw/skills
Author: lookupmark · Source status: Clear source
Find and send local files to a chat channel (Telegram, Discord, WhatsApp, Signal, Slack).
Score basis:Clear source · High risk signals · OpenClaw
Search to add skills, or paste 2–4 comma-separated slugs.
How differences are detected
A row is marked different when selected skills have distinct values. Only-differences mode hides rows that are identical.
How best values are highlighted
Audit score, evidence confidence, trust score, and community signal prefer higher values; execution risk and install friction prefer lower values.
How to read risk tags
Risk tags come from SAS-v2.1 public-evidence signals and point to command, network, secret, context, or supply-chain items to review before install.
Selected audit signals
Claude Task Runner
Execution risk:High
Threat tags:unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap
Control gaps:missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
OMNI — All-In-One Master Skill
Execution risk:High
Threat tags:unexpected code execution, identity privilege abuse, data exfiltration
Control gaps:missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
| Dimension | Claude Task Runner | OMNI — All-In-One Master Skill |
|---|---|---|
| SAS-v2.1 pre-install audit | ||
Threat tags | unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap | unexpected code execution, identity privilege abuse, data exfiltration |
Permission summary | Permission review, Network, Command | Permission review, Network, Secrets, Command |
Evidence confidence | 65% | 67% |
| Source & provenance | ||
Freshness | 2026-03-29 | 2026-04-02 |
| Risk & trust | ||
Trust score | 85 | 88 |
Audit signals | network access, runs shell, writes files | needs credentials, network access, runs shell, writes files |
| Install & compatibility | ||
Supported tools | Claude, OpenClaw | Claude, Codex, OpenClaw |
Install friction | 50 | 65 |
Repository: openclaw/skills
Author: lanyasheng · Source status: Clear source
当需要为目标 skill 生成改进候选、把上次失败信息注入下一轮生成、或分析历史记忆模式来避免重复失败时使用。支持 --trace 注入失败上下文。不用于打分(用 improvement-discriminator)或评估(用 improvement-learner)。
Score basis:Clear source · High risk signals · OpenClaw
Repository: openclaw/skills
Author: jpengcheng523-netizen · Source status: Clear source
Analyze resource usage patterns and predict future scaling needs using trend analysis and forecasting methods for capacity planning and auto-scaling decisions.
Score basis:Clear source · High risk signals · Universal