Compare skills
Pick 2–4 skills and compare what really matters: fit, risk, install effort, and community signal.
Comparison matrix
Highlights show current best; tooltip explains diff/best rules.
SAS-v2.1 diff rules / risk tag notes
Start with the matrix. Open this section when you need to understand audit grades, top threats, control gaps, and best-value highlights.
mcpcan
Kymo-MCP/mcpcan · Score 81
Search to add skills, or paste 2–4 comma-separated slugs.
How differences are detected
A row is marked different when selected skills have distinct values. Only-differences mode hides rows that are identical.
How best values are highlighted
Audit score, evidence confidence, trust score, and community signal prefer higher values; execution risk and install friction prefer lower values.
How to read risk tags
Risk tags come from SAS-v2.1 public-evidence signals and point to command, network, secret, context, or supply-chain items to review before install.
Selected audit signals
agentlens
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：prompt injection, tool poisoning, unexpected code execution
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
agentic-ai-engineering
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：prompt injection, tool poisoning, unexpected code execution
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
fossology
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap
Control gaps：broad permissions, shell without guardrails, network without allowlist
mcpcan
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, identity privilege abuse, data exfiltration
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
| Dimension | agentlens | agentic-ai-engineering | fossology | mcpcan |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SAS-v2.1 pre-install audit | ||||
Audit grade | D · Limited evidence | C · Review first | C · Review first | C · Review first |
Threat tags | prompt injection, tool poisoning, unexpected code execution | prompt injection, tool poisoning, unexpected code execution | unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap | unexpected code execution, identity privilege abuse, data exfiltration |
Control gaps | missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails | missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails | broad permissions, shell without guardrails, network without allowlist | missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails |
Permission summary | Permission review, Network, Secrets, Command | Permission review, Network, Command | Permission review, Network, Command | Permission review, Network, Secrets, Command |
Evidence confidence | 69% | 68% | 67% | 67% |
| Source & provenance | ||||
Provenance | agenticloops-ai/agentlens | agenticloops-ai/agentic-ai-engineering | fossology/fossology | Kymo-MCP/mcpcan |
Category | Operations & Infra | Dev & Engineering | Operations & Infra | Operations & Infra |
Freshness | ||||
| Risk & trust | ||||
Trust score | 77 | 82 | 81 | 81 |
Audit signals | needs credentials, network access, writes files | No explicit signals | ||
| Install & compatibility | ||||
Install friction | 55 | 40 | 50 | 55 |
| Community | ||||
Stars | 9 | 49 | 980 | 717 |
2026-03-16 |
2026-04-07 |
2026-04-06 |
2026-04-03 |
needs credentials, network access |
