Compare skills
Pick 2–4 skills and compare what really matters: fit, risk, install effort, and community signal.
Comparison matrix
Highlights show current best; tooltip explains diff/best rules.
Score-basis diff rules / risk tag notes
Start with the matrix. Open this section when you need to understand audit grades, top threats, control gaps, and best-value highlights.
Suggested baseline
Search to add skills, or paste 2–4 comma-separated slugs.
How differences are detected
A row is marked different when selected skills have distinct values. Only-differences mode hides rows that are identical.
How best values are highlighted
Pre-install score, evidence completeness, and community signal prefer higher values; execution risk and install friction prefer lower values.
How to read risk tags
Risk tags come from SAS-v2.1 public-evidence signals and point to command, network, secret, context, or supply-chain items to review before install.
Selected audit signals
agent-identifier
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
docker-selenium
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
claude-plugins-official
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
| Dimension | agent-identifier | docker-selenium | claude-plugins-official |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-install decision | |||
Pre-install score | 80 · Manual review | 79 · Manual review | 92 · Manual review |
Score basis | Clear source, High execution risk, Claude | Clear source, High execution risk, Universal | Clear source, High execution risk, Universal |
Evidence completeness | 65% | 67% | 65% |
| Source & provenance | |||
Provenance | anthropics/claude-code/tree/main/plugins/plugin-dev/skills/agent-development | SeleniumHQ/docker-selenium | anthropics/claude-plugins-official |
Category | Operations & Infra | Operations & Infra | Automation & Workflows |
Freshness | |||
| Risk & permission signals | |||
Audit signals | runs shell, writes files | No explicit signals | metadata-only |
Permission hints | registry access, remote metadata pull, runtime dependencies may be required | repository clone, local runtime dependencies | repository clone |
| Install & compatibility | |||
Supported tools | Claude, Codex, Cursor, Universal | Universal | Universal |
Install method | registry-install | script-backed | script-backed |
Install friction | |||
| Community | |||
Stars | 65.5K | 8.6K | 16.9K |
Repository: openclaw/skills
Author: tenequm · Source status: Clear source
Convert documentation, GitHub repos, PDFs, codebases, videos, and more into structured AI skills using the skill-seekers CLI.
Score basis：Clear source · High execution risk · Claude · Evidence completeness 71%
Repository: knowledge-work-plugins
Author: anthropics · Source status: Clear source
Open source repository of plugins primarily intended for knowledge workers to use in Claude Cowork
Score basis：Clear source · High execution risk · Universal · Evidence completeness 67%
Repository: claude-code-security-review
Author: anthropics · Source status: Clear source
An AI-powered security review GitHub Action using Claude to analyze code changes for security vulnerabilities.
Score basis：Clear source · High execution risk · Universal · Evidence completeness 65%
Repository: claude-code-base-action
Author: anthropics · Source status: Clear source
This repo is a mirror of the contents of base-action in https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code-action.
Score basis：Clear source · High execution risk · Universal · Evidence completeness 65%
2026-02-04 |
2026-04-05 |
2026-04-14 |
60 |
40 |
75 |
