Compare skills
Pick 2–4 skills and compare what really matters: fit, risk, install effort, and community signal.
This comparison came from collection: Product and project management
Compare team permissions, data writes, and notification capabilities.
Comparison matrix
Highlights show current best; tooltip explains diff/best rules.
SAS-v2.1 diff rules / risk tag notes
Start with the matrix. Open this section when you need to understand audit grades, top threats, control gaps, and best-value highlights.
Suggested baseline
Search to add skills, or paste 2–4 comma-separated slugs.
How differences are detected
A row is marked different when selected skills have distinct values. Only-differences mode hides rows that are identical.
How best values are highlighted
Audit score, evidence confidence, trust score, and community signal prefer higher values; execution risk and install friction prefer lower values.
How to read risk tags
Risk tags come from SAS-v2.1 public-evidence signals and point to command, network, secret, context, or supply-chain items to review before install.
Selected audit signals
Slack
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, identity privilege abuse, data exfiltration
Control gaps：missing repo, missing license, broad permissions
Notion
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, identity privilege abuse, data exfiltration
Control gaps：missing repo, missing license, broad permissions
docs
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
| Dimension | Slack | Notion | docs |
|---|---|---|---|
| SAS-v2.1 pre-install audit | |||
Audit grade | D · Limited evidence | D · Limited evidence | C · Review first |
Execution risk | High | High | High |
Threat tags | unexpected code execution, identity privilege abuse, data exfiltration | unexpected code execution, identity privilege abuse, data exfiltration | unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap |
Control gaps | missing repo, missing license, broad permissions | missing repo, missing license, broad permissions | missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails |
Permission summary | Permission review, Network, Secrets, Command | Permission review, Network, Secrets, Command | Permission review, Network, Command |
Evidence confidence | 67% | 67% | 65% |
| Source & provenance | |||
Provenance | Source needs review | Source needs review | snakemake-workflows/docs |
Category | Integrations & Connectors | Integrations & Connectors | Automation & Workflows |
Freshness | |||
| Risk & trust | |||
Trust score | 70 | 70 | 87 |
Audit signals | needs credentials, runs shell, writes files | needs credentials, network access, runs shell, writes files | metadata-only |
| Install & compatibility | |||
Supported tools | Codex, OpenClaw, Claude, Cursor, Universal | Codex, OpenClaw, Claude, Cursor, Universal | Universal |
Install method | instruction-only | instruction-only | script-backed |
Install friction | |||
| Community | |||
Stars | 113 | 225 | 157 |
Repository: docs
Author: kestra-io · Source status: Clear source
Documentation for Kestra — an event-driven, language-agnostic orchestration and scheduling platform to manage millions of workflows declaratively in code.
Score basis：Clear source · Risk needs review · Universal
2026-01-05 |
2026-01-05 |
2022-02-03 |
Permission hints | review skill metadata before install, check required credentials in skill docs | review skill metadata before install, check required credentials in skill docs | repository clone |
|---|
100 |
100 |
75 |
