Compare skills
Pick 2–4 skills and compare what really matters: fit, risk, install effort, and community signal.
This comparison came from collection: OpenClaw pack
Best for comparing 2–4 candidates for the same app.
Selected skills (2/4)
Comparison matrix
Highlights show current best; tooltip explains diff/best rules.
SAS-v2.1 diff rules / risk tag notes
Start with the matrix. Open this section when you need to understand audit grades, top threats, control gaps, and best-value highlights.
Suggested baseline
Repository: pending
Author: jontsai · Source status: Source needs review
Mission control dashboard for OpenClaw - real-time session monitoring, LLM usage tracking, cost intelligence, and system vitals.
Score basis：Source needs review · High risk signals · Claude
Search to add skills, or paste 2–4 comma-separated slugs.
How differences are detected
A row is marked different when selected skills have distinct values. Only-differences mode hides rows that are identical.
How best values are highlighted
Audit score, evidence confidence, trust score, and community signal prefer higher values; execution risk and install friction prefer lower values.
How to read risk tags
Risk tags come from SAS-v2.1 public-evidence signals and point to command, network, secret, context, or supply-chain items to review before install.
Selected audit signals
OpenClaw Memory
Execution risk：Low
Threat tags：identity privilege abuse, data exfiltration, memory context poisoning
Control gaps：missing repo, missing license, broad permissions
OpenClaw Auto‑Updater (Safe + Scheduled + Summary)
Execution risk：Low
Threat tags：identity privilege abuse, data exfiltration, supply chain
Control gaps：missing repo, missing license, unclear tool boundary
| Dimension | OpenClaw Memory | OpenClaw Auto‑Updater (Safe + Scheduled + Summary) |
|---|---|---|
| SAS-v2.1 pre-install audit | ||
Audit grade | D · Limited evidence | C · Review first |
Execution risk | Low | Low |
Threat tags | identity privilege abuse, data exfiltration, memory context poisoning | identity privilege abuse, data exfiltration, supply chain |
Control gaps | missing repo, missing license, broad permissions | missing repo, missing license, unclear tool boundary |
Permission summary | Permission review, Network, Secrets | Permission review, Network, Secrets |
Evidence confidence | 69% | 65% |
| Source & provenance | ||
Provenance | Source needs review | Source needs review |
Category | Dev & Engineering | Productivity & Docs |
Freshness | 2026-03-18 | 2026-02-04 |
| Risk & trust | ||
Trust score | 72 | 69 |
Audit signals | writes files | No explicit signals |
Permission hints | ||
| Install & compatibility | ||
Supported tools | Codex, OpenClaw, Claude, Cursor, Universal | Codex, OpenClaw, Claude, Cursor, Universal |
Install method | instruction-only | instruction-only |
Install friction | ||
| Community | ||
Stars | 21 | 11 |
Repository: pending
Author: phenomenoner · Source status: Source needs review
Use when: you want a structured audit -> options -> recommended plan to improve an OpenClaw workspace (cost, model routing, context discipline, delegation, r...
Score basis：Source needs review · Low risk signals · Claude
Repository: pending
Author: Asif · Source status: Source needs review
Reduce OpenClaw token usage and API costs through smart model routing, heartbeat optimization, budget tracking, and native 2026.2.15 features (session prunin...
Score basis：Source needs review · High risk signals · Claude
review skill metadata before install, check required credentials in skill docs |
review skill metadata before install, check required credentials in skill docs |
85 |
