Compare skills
Pick 2–4 skills and compare what really matters: fit, risk, install effort, and community signal.
This comparison came from collection: OpenClaw pack
Best for comparing 2–4 candidates for the same app.
Comparison matrix
Highlights show current best; tooltip explains diff/best rules.
SAS-v2.1 diff rules / risk tag notes
Start with the matrix. Open this section when you need to understand audit grades, top threats, control gaps, and best-value highlights.
Suggested baseline
Search to add skills, or paste 2–4 comma-separated slugs.
How differences are detected
A row is marked different when selected skills have distinct values. Only-differences mode hides rows that are identical.
How best values are highlighted
Audit score, evidence confidence, trust score, and community signal prefer higher values; execution risk and install friction prefer lower values.
How to read risk tags
Risk tags come from SAS-v2.1 public-evidence signals and point to command, network, secret, context, or supply-chain items to review before install.
Selected audit signals
OpenClaw Memory
Execution risk：Low
Threat tags：identity privilege abuse, data exfiltration, memory context poisoning
Control gaps：missing repo, missing license, broad permissions
OpenClaw Token Optimizer
Execution risk：Low
Threat tags：identity privilege abuse, data exfiltration, supply chain
Control gaps：missing repo, missing license, broad permissions
Openclaw Command Center
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, identity privilege abuse, data exfiltration
Control gaps：missing repo, missing license, unclear tool boundary
| Dimension | OpenClaw Memory | OpenClaw Token Optimizer | Openclaw Command Center |
|---|---|---|---|
| SAS-v2.1 pre-install audit | |||
Execution risk | Low | Low | High |
Threat tags | identity privilege abuse, data exfiltration, memory context poisoning | identity privilege abuse, data exfiltration, supply chain | unexpected code execution, identity privilege abuse, data exfiltration |
Control gaps | missing repo, missing license, broad permissions | missing repo, missing license, broad permissions | missing repo, missing license, unclear tool boundary |
Permission summary | Permission review, Network, Secrets | Permission review, Network, Secrets | Permission review, Network, Secrets, Command |
Evidence confidence | 69% | 63% | 65% |
| Source & provenance | |||
Category | Dev & Engineering | Integrations & Connectors | Operations & Infra |
Freshness | 2026-03-18 | 2026-02-28 | 2026-03-08 |
| Risk & trust | |||
Trust score | 72 | 75 | 75 |
Audit signals | |||
| Install & compatibility | |||
Install friction | 85 | 100 | 95 |
| Community | |||
Stars | 21 | 26 | 63 |
Repository: pending
Author: phenomenoner · Source status: Source needs review
Use when: you want a structured audit -> options -> recommended plan to improve an OpenClaw workspace (cost, model routing, context discipline, delegation, r...
Score basis：Source needs review · Low risk signals · Claude
Repository: pending
Author: CodingPenguin44 · Source status: Source needs review
Schedule automatic OpenClaw and skill updates with reliable cron templates, timezone-safe scheduling, and clear summary outputs.
Score basis：Source needs review · Low risk signals · Claude
needs credentials, network access |
runs shell |
