Anthropic
Repository: openclaw/skills
Author: membranedev · Source status: Clear source
Score 79Clear source
Manual reviewAnthropic integration.
Score basis：Clear source · High risk signals · Claude
Author unclaimed
Claude
2026-03-08
Compare skills
Pick 2–4 skills and compare what really matters: fit, risk, install effort, and community signal.
This comparison came from collection: Claude pack
Best for comparing 2–4 candidates for the same app.
Selected skills (2/4)
Comparison matrix
Highlights show current best; tooltip explains diff/best rules.
SAS-v2.1 diff rules / risk tag notes
Start with the matrix. Open this section when you need to understand audit grades, top threats, control gaps, and best-value highlights.
Suggested baseline
Search to add skills, or paste 2–4 comma-separated slugs.
How differences are detected
A row is marked different when selected skills have distinct values. Only-differences mode hides rows that are identical.
How best values are highlighted
Audit score, evidence confidence, trust score, and community signal prefer higher values; execution risk and install friction prefer lower values.
How to read risk tags
Risk tags come from SAS-v2.1 public-evidence signals and point to command, network, secret, context, or supply-chain items to review before install.
Selected audit signals
Claude Task Runner
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
claude-automation-recommender
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：data exfiltration, human approval gap
Control gaps：missing license, network without allowlist, no human approval
| Dimension | Claude Task Runner | claude-automation-recommender |
|---|---|---|
| SAS-v2.1 pre-install audit | ||
Audit grade | C · Review first | C · Review first |
Execution risk | High | High |
Threat tags | unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap | data exfiltration, human approval gap |
Control gaps | missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails | missing license, network without allowlist, no human approval |
Permission summary | Permission review, Network, Command | Network, Command |
Evidence confidence | 65% | 63% |
| Source & provenance | ||
Provenance | openclaw/skills | anthropics/claude-plugins-official/tree/main/plugins/claude-code-setup/skills/claude-automation-recommender |
Category | Data & Analytics | Dev & Engineering |
Freshness | 2026-03-29 | |
| Risk & trust | ||
Trust score | 85 | 76 |
Audit signals | network access, runs shell, writes files | No explicit signals |
Permission hints | ||
| Install & compatibility | ||
Supported tools | Claude, OpenClaw | Claude, Codex, Cursor, Universal |
Install method | script-backed | registry-install |
Install friction | 50 | |
| Community | ||
Stars | 0 | 7K |
Repository: claude-code
Author: anthropics · Source status: Clear source
Migrate prompts and code from Claude Sonnet 4.0, Sonnet 4.5, or Opus 4.1 to Opus 4.5.
Score basis：Clear source · High risk signals · Claude
Repository: openclaw/skills
Author: ngocgd · Source status: Clear source
Reduce Anthropic API costs (cache read, compaction, context bloat) for OpenClaw agents.
Score basis：Clear source · High risk signals · Claude
verify source provenance before install |
registry access, remote metadata pull, runtime dependencies may be required |
50 |