Claude Opus 4 5 Migration
Repository: claude-code
Author: anthropics · Source status: Clear source
Migrate prompts and code from Claude Sonnet 4.0, Sonnet 4.5, or Opus 4.1 to Opus 4.5.
Score basis:Clear source · High risk signals · Claude
Compare skills
Pick 2–4 skills and compare what really matters: fit, risk, install effort, and community signal.
This comparison came from collection: Claude pack
Best for comparing 2–4 candidates for the same app.
Selected skills (2/4)
Comparison matrix
Highlights show current best; tooltip explains diff/best rules.
SAS-v2.1 diff rules / risk tag notes
Start with the matrix. Open this section when you need to understand audit grades, top threats, control gaps, and best-value highlights.
Suggested baseline
Search to add skills, or paste 2–4 comma-separated slugs.
How differences are detected
A row is marked different when selected skills have distinct values. Only-differences mode hides rows that are identical.
How best values are highlighted
Audit score, evidence confidence, trust score, and community signal prefer higher values; execution risk and install friction prefer lower values.
How to read risk tags
Risk tags come from SAS-v2.1 public-evidence signals and point to command, network, secret, context, or supply-chain items to review before install.
Selected audit signals
claude-automation-recommender
Execution risk:High
Threat tags:data exfiltration, human approval gap
Control gaps:missing license, network without allowlist, no human approval
Anthropic
Execution risk:High
Threat tags:unexpected code execution, identity privilege abuse, data exfiltration
Control gaps:missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
| Dimension | claude-automation-recommender | Anthropic |
|---|---|---|
| SAS-v2.1 pre-install audit | ||
Audit grade | C · Review first | C · Review first |
Execution risk | High | High |
Threat tags | data exfiltration, human approval gap | unexpected code execution, identity privilege abuse, data exfiltration |
Control gaps | missing license, network without allowlist, no human approval | missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails |
Permission summary | Network, Command | Permission review, Network, Secrets, Command |
Evidence confidence | 63% | 67% |
| Source & provenance | ||
Provenance | anthropics/claude-plugins-official/tree/main/plugins/claude-code-setup/skills/claude-automation-recommender | openclaw/skills |
Category | Dev & Engineering | Integrations & Connectors |
Freshness | 2026-02-04 | |
| Risk & trust | ||
Trust score | 76 | 79 |
Audit signals | No explicit signals | needs credentials, network access, runs shell, writes files |
Permission hints | ||
| Install & compatibility | ||
Supported tools | Claude, Codex, Cursor, Universal | Claude |
Install method | registry-install | script-backed |
Install friction | 50 | |
| Community | ||
Stars | 7K | 0 |
Repository: openclaw/skills
Author: zwd0313 · Source status: Clear source
Run Claude Code tasks in headless mode with `claude -p` through the local `cc-task-runner.sh` wrapper, including model switching, JSON output capture, structured schema checks, multi-file artifact validation, and glob ma
Score basis:Clear source · High risk signals · Claude
Repository: openclaw/skills
Author: ngocgd · Source status: Clear source
Reduce Anthropic API costs (cache read, compaction, context bloat) for OpenClaw agents.
Score basis:Clear source · High risk signals · Claude
registry access, remote metadata pull, runtime dependencies may be required |
verify source provenance before install |
65 |