Compare skills
Pick 2–4 skills and compare what really matters: fit, risk, install effort, and community signal.
This comparison came from collection: Claude pack
Best for comparing 2–4 candidates for the same app.
Comparison matrix
Highlights show current best; tooltip explains diff/best rules.
SAS-v2.1 diff rules / risk tag notes
Start with the matrix. Open this section when you need to understand audit grades, top threats, control gaps, and best-value highlights.
Suggested baseline
Repository: claude-plugins-official
Author: anthropics · Source status: Clear source
Analyze a codebase and recommend Claude Code automations (hooks, subagents, skills, plugins, MCP servers).
Score basis：Clear source · Low risk signals · Claude
Search to add skills, or paste 2–4 comma-separated slugs.
How differences are detected
A row is marked different when selected skills have distinct values. Only-differences mode hides rows that are identical.
How best values are highlighted
Audit score, evidence confidence, trust score, and community signal prefer higher values; execution risk and install friction prefer lower values.
How to read risk tags
Risk tags come from SAS-v2.1 public-evidence signals and point to command, network, secret, context, or supply-chain items to review before install.
Selected audit signals
Anthropic
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, identity privilege abuse, data exfiltration
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
Claude Task Runner
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
Anthropic Token Optimizer
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, identity privilege abuse, data exfiltration
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
| Dimension | Anthropic | Claude Task Runner | Anthropic Token Optimizer |
|---|---|---|---|
| SAS-v2.1 pre-install audit | |||
Audit grade | C · Review first | C · Review first | C · Review first |
Execution risk | High | High | High |
Threat tags | unexpected code execution, identity privilege abuse, data exfiltration | unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap | unexpected code execution, identity privilege abuse, data exfiltration |
Control gaps | missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails | missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails | missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails |
Permission summary | Permission review, Network, Secrets, Command | Permission review, Network, Command | Permission review, Network, Secrets, Command |
Evidence confidence | 67% | 65% | 69% |
| Source & provenance | |||
Provenance | openclaw/skills | openclaw/skills | openclaw/skills |
Category | Integrations & Connectors | Data & Analytics | Knowledge & RAG |
Freshness | |||
| Risk & trust | |||
Trust score | 79 | 85 | 85 |
Audit signals | |||
| Install & compatibility | |||
Supported tools | Claude | Claude, OpenClaw | Claude, OpenClaw |
Install method | script-backed | script-backed | script-backed |
Install friction | |||
| Community | |||
Stars | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Repository: claude-code
Author: anthropics · Source status: Clear source
Migrate prompts and code from Claude Sonnet 4.0, Sonnet 4.5, or Opus 4.1 to Opus 4.5.
Score basis：Clear source · High risk signals · Claude
2026-03-08 |
2026-03-29 |
2026-04-02 |
network access, runs shell, writes files |
needs credentials, network access, runs shell, writes files |
Permission hints | verify source provenance before install | verify source provenance before install | verify source provenance before install |
|---|
65 |
50 |
65 |
