Compare skills
Pick 2–4 skills and compare what really matters: fit, risk, install effort, and community signal.
This comparison came from collection: Recently updated
Useful when maintenance freshness matters.
Selected skills (2/4)
Comparison matrix
Highlights show current best; tooltip explains diff/best rules.
SAS-v2.1 diff rules / risk tag notes
Start with the matrix. Open this section when you need to understand audit grades, top threats, control gaps, and best-value highlights.
Suggested baseline
Repository: npm-editorconfig
Author: wilsonian-ionpump508 · Source status: Clear source
Add an opinionated .editorconfig to any project with instant copy, overwrite prompts, and zero dependencies
Score basis：Clear source · Risk needs review · Universal
Search to add skills, or paste 2–4 comma-separated slugs.
How differences are detected
A row is marked different when selected skills have distinct values. Only-differences mode hides rows that are identical.
How best values are highlighted
Audit score, evidence confidence, trust score, and community signal prefer higher values; execution risk and install friction prefer lower values.
How to read risk tags
Risk tags come from SAS-v2.1 public-evidence signals and point to command, network, secret, context, or supply-chain items to review before install.
Selected audit signals
AutoPaperBot
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：prompt injection, tool poisoning, unexpected code execution
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
prompt_tracker
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：prompt injection, tool poisoning, unexpected code execution
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
| Dimension | AutoPaperBot | prompt_tracker |
|---|---|---|
| SAS-v2.1 pre-install audit | ||
Audit grade | C · Review first | C · Review first |
Execution risk | High | High |
Threat tags | prompt injection, tool poisoning, unexpected code execution | prompt injection, tool poisoning, unexpected code execution |
Control gaps | missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails | missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails |
Permission summary | Permission review, Network, Command | Permission review, Network, Command |
Evidence confidence | 67% | 67% |
| Source & provenance | ||
Provenance | ouyangyipeng/AutoPaperBot | DavidGeismarLtd/prompt_tracker |
Category | Automation & Workflows | Automation & Workflows |
Freshness | 2026-04-14 | |
| Risk & trust | ||
Trust score | 61 | 61 |
Audit signals | metadata-only | |
| Install & compatibility | ||
Supported tools | Universal | Universal |
Install method | script-backed | script-backed |
Install friction | ||
| Community | ||
Stars | 12 | 5 |
Repository: prompt-optimizer
Author: redredchen01 · Source status: Clear source
GitHub repository redredchen01/prompt-optimizer; metadata recovered from GitHub Search API.
Score basis：Clear source · Risk needs review · Universal
Repository: mece-skill
Author: bigboskuai-prog · Source status: Clear source
Enforce MECE checks to find overlaps, gaps, and cleanly decompose specs, plans, and AI prompts
Score basis：Clear source · Risk needs review · Universal
Repository: claude-code
Author: claude-code-best · Source status: Clear source
原汁原昧 Claude Code 可运行,可构建, 可调试版; Typescript 类型全修复; 企业级可靠性; 安全无毒, lock 文件保真, 可直接 bun i; bun run dev 启动
Score basis：Clear source · Risk needs review · Universal
metadata-only |
Permission hints | repository clone | repository clone |
|---|
75 |
