himalaya
Repository: openclaw
Author: openclaw · Source status: Clear source
Score 76Clear source
Manual reviewCLI to manage emails via IMAP/SMTP.
Score basis：Clear source · High risk signals · Claude
Author unclaimed
Claude
178.2K
Compare skills
Pick 2–4 skills and compare what really matters: fit, risk, install effort, and community signal.
This comparison came from collection: Community interest
Useful when many similar candidates exist.
Comparison matrix
Highlights show current best; tooltip explains diff/best rules.
SAS-v2.1 diff rules / risk tag notes
Start with the matrix. Open this section when you need to understand audit grades, top threats, control gaps, and best-value highlights.
Suggested baseline
Search to add skills, or paste 2–4 comma-separated slugs.
How differences are detected
A row is marked different when selected skills have distinct values. Only-differences mode hides rows that are identical.
How best values are highlighted
Audit score, evidence confidence, trust score, and community signal prefer higher values; execution risk and install friction prefer lower values.
How to read risk tags
Risk tags come from SAS-v2.1 public-evidence signals and point to command, network, secret, context, or supply-chain items to review before install.
Selected audit signals
n8n
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
clawhub
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：data exfiltration, human approval gap
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, network without allowlist
openclaw
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
| Dimension | n8n | clawhub | openclaw |
|---|---|---|---|
| SAS-v2.1 pre-install audit | |||
Audit grade | C · Review first | C · Review first | C · Review first |
Execution risk | High | High | High |
Threat tags | unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap | data exfiltration, human approval gap | unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap |
Control gaps | missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails | missing license, broad permissions, network without allowlist | missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails |
Permission summary | Permission review, Network, Command | Permission review, Network, Command | Permission review, Network, Command |
Evidence confidence | 65% | 63% | 65% |
| Source & provenance | |||
Provenance | n8n-io/n8n | openclaw/openclaw/tree/main/skills/clawhub | openclaw/openclaw |
Category | Automation & Workflows | Dev & Engineering | Agent & Tools |
Freshness | |||
| Risk & trust | |||
Trust score | 92 | 76 | 92 |
Audit signals | |||
| Install & compatibility | |||
Supported tools | Universal | Claude, Codex, Cursor, Universal | Universal |
Install method | script-backed | registry-install | script-backed |
Install friction | |||
| Community | |||
Stars | 183.9K | 178.2K | 356.8K |
2026-04-14 |
2026-02-04 |
2026-04-14 |
network access |
metadata-only |
Permission hints | repository clone | registry access, remote metadata pull, runtime dependencies may be required | repository clone |
|---|
75 |
50 |
75 |