openclaw
Repository: openclaw
Author: openclaw · Source status: Clear source
Score 92Clear source
Manual reviewYour own personal AI assistant.
Score basis：Clear source · Risk needs review · Universal
Author unclaimed
Universal
356.8K
Compare skills
Pick 2–4 skills and compare what really matters: fit, risk, install effort, and community signal.
This comparison came from collection: Community interest
Useful when many similar candidates exist.
Comparison matrix
Highlights show current best; tooltip explains diff/best rules.
SAS-v2.1 diff rules / risk tag notes
Start with the matrix. Open this section when you need to understand audit grades, top threats, control gaps, and best-value highlights.
Suggested baseline
Search to add skills, or paste 2–4 comma-separated slugs.
How differences are detected
A row is marked different when selected skills have distinct values. Only-differences mode hides rows that are identical.
How best values are highlighted
Audit score, evidence confidence, trust score, and community signal prefer higher values; execution risk and install friction prefer lower values.
How to read risk tags
Risk tags come from SAS-v2.1 public-evidence signals and point to command, network, secret, context, or supply-chain items to review before install.
Selected audit signals
himalaya
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
summarize
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
obsidian
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：data exfiltration, human approval gap
Control gaps：missing license, network without allowlist, no human approval
| Dimension | himalaya | summarize | obsidian |
|---|---|---|---|
| SAS-v2.1 pre-install audit | |||
Threat tags | unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap | unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap | data exfiltration, human approval gap |
Control gaps | missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails | missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails | missing license, network without allowlist, no human approval |
Permission summary | Permission review, Network, Command | Permission review, Network, Command | Network, Command |
Evidence confidence | 65% | 65% | 63% |
| Source & provenance | |||
Provenance | openclaw/openclaw/tree/main/skills/himalaya | openclaw/openclaw/tree/main/skills/summarize | openclaw/openclaw/tree/main/skills/obsidian |
| Risk & trust | |||
Trust score | 76 | 74 | 74 |
Audit signals | runs shell, writes files | runs shell, writes files | No explicit signals |
| Install & compatibility | |||
Install friction | 60 | 60 | 50 |
Repository: openclaw
Author: openclaw · Source status: Clear source
Use the ClawHub CLI to search, install, update, and publish agent skills from clawhub.com.
Score basis：Clear source · High risk signals · Claude