Compare skills
Pick 2–4 skills and compare what really matters: fit, risk, install effort, and community signal.
This comparison came from collection: Community interest
Useful when many similar candidates exist.
Comparison matrix
Highlights show current best; tooltip explains diff/best rules.
SAS-v2.1 diff rules / risk tag notes
Start with the matrix. Open this section when you need to understand audit grades, top threats, control gaps, and best-value highlights.
himalaya
openclaw/openclaw/tree/main/skills/himalaya · Score 76
Search to add skills, or paste 2–4 comma-separated slugs.
How differences are detected
A row is marked different when selected skills have distinct values. Only-differences mode hides rows that are identical.
How best values are highlighted
Audit score, evidence confidence, trust score, and community signal prefer higher values; execution risk and install friction prefer lower values.
How to read risk tags
Risk tags come from SAS-v2.1 public-evidence signals and point to command, network, secret, context, or supply-chain items to review before install.
Selected audit signals
clawhub
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：data exfiltration, human approval gap
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, network without allowlist
openclaw
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
summarize
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
himalaya
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
| Dimension | clawhub | openclaw | summarize | himalaya |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SAS-v2.1 pre-install audit | ||||
Threat tags | data exfiltration, human approval gap | unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap | unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap | unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap |
Control gaps | missing license, broad permissions, network without allowlist | missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails | missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails | missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails |
Evidence confidence | 63% | 65% | 65% | 65% |
| Source & provenance | ||||
Provenance | openclaw/openclaw/tree/main/skills/clawhub | openclaw/openclaw | openclaw/openclaw/tree/main/skills/summarize | openclaw/openclaw/tree/main/skills/himalaya |
Category | Dev & Engineering | Agent & Tools | Productivity & Docs | Productivity & Docs |
Freshness | ||||
| Risk & trust | ||||
Trust score | 76 | 92 | 74 | 76 |
Audit signals | network access | metadata-only | ||
| Install & compatibility | ||||
Supported tools | Claude, Codex, Cursor, Universal | Universal | Claude, Codex, Cursor, Universal | Claude, Codex, Cursor, Universal |
Install method | registry-install | script-backed | registry-install | registry-install |
Install friction | ||||
| Community | ||||
Stars | 178.2K | 356.8K | 178.2K | 178.2K |
2026-02-04 |
2026-04-14 |
2026-02-04 |
2026-02-04 |
runs shell, writes files |
Permission hints | registry access, remote metadata pull, runtime dependencies may be required | repository clone | registry access, remote metadata pull, runtime dependencies may be required | registry access, remote metadata pull, runtime dependencies may be required |
|---|
50 |
75 |
60 |
60 |
