Apollo Debugging
Repository: openclaw/skills
Author: nic-yuan · Source status: Clear source
Score 81Clear source
Manual review>
Score basis：Clear source · Low risk signals · OpenClaw
Author unclaimed
OpenClaw
2026-04-03
Compare skills
Pick 2–4 skills and compare what really matters: fit, risk, install effort, and community signal.
This comparison came from collection: Lower risk first
Useful for security-sensitive comparisons.
Selected skills (2/4)
Comparison matrix
Highlights show current best; tooltip explains diff/best rules.
SAS-v2.1 diff rules / risk tag notes
Start with the matrix. Open this section when you need to understand audit grades, top threats, control gaps, and best-value highlights.
Suggested baseline
Search to add skills, or paste 2–4 comma-separated slugs.
How differences are detected
A row is marked different when selected skills have distinct values. Only-differences mode hides rows that are identical.
How best values are highlighted
Audit score, evidence confidence, trust score, and community signal prefer higher values; execution risk and install friction prefer lower values.
How to read risk tags
Risk tags come from SAS-v2.1 public-evidence signals and point to command, network, secret, context, or supply-chain items to review before install.
Selected audit signals
jd-finance
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap
Control gaps：missing license, shell without guardrails, network without allowlist
Superpowers Systematic Debugging (袁文同优化版)
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap
Control gaps：missing license, shell without guardrails, network without allowlist
| Dimension | jd-finance | Superpowers Systematic Debugging (袁文同优化版) |
|---|---|---|
| SAS-v2.1 pre-install audit | ||
Audit grade | C · Review first | C · Review first |
Execution risk | High | High |
Threat tags | unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap | unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap |
Control gaps | missing license, shell without guardrails, network without allowlist | missing license, shell without guardrails, network without allowlist |
Permission summary | Network, Command | Network, Command |
Evidence confidence | 63% | 63% |
| Source & provenance | ||
Provenance | openclaw/skills | openclaw/skills |
Category | Vertical & Solutions | Data & Analytics |
Freshness | 2026-04-02 | |
| Risk & trust | ||
Trust score | 81 | 81 |
Audit signals | No explicit signals | |
| Install & compatibility | ||
Supported tools | Universal | OpenClaw |
Install method | script-backed | script-backed |
Install friction | 40 | |
| Community | ||
Stars | 0 | 0 |
Repository: openclaw/skills
Author: nic-yuan · Source status: Clear source
Use when about to claim any work is complete, fixed, passing, or successful.
Score basis：Clear source · Low risk signals · OpenClaw
Permission hints | verify source provenance before install | verify source provenance before install |
|---|
40 |