Compare skills
Pick 2–4 skills and compare what really matters: fit, risk, install effort, and community signal.
This comparison came from collection: Lower risk first
Useful for security-sensitive comparisons.
Comparison matrix
Highlights show current best; tooltip explains diff/best rules.
Score-basis diff rules / risk tag notes
Start with the matrix. Open this section when you need to understand audit grades, top threats, control gaps, and best-value highlights.
Suggested baseline
Search to add skills, or paste 2–4 comma-separated slugs.
How differences are detected
A row is marked different when selected skills have distinct values. Only-differences mode hides rows that are identical.
How best values are highlighted
Pre-install score, evidence completeness, and community signal prefer higher values; execution risk and install friction prefer lower values.
How to read risk tags
Risk tags come from SAS-v2.1 public-evidence signals and point to command, network, secret, context, or supply-chain items to review before install.
Selected audit signals
jd-daoda
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap
Control gaps：missing license, shell without guardrails, network without allowlist
Apollo Debugging
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap
Control gaps：missing license, shell without guardrails, network without allowlist
jd-finance
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap
Control gaps：missing license, shell without guardrails, network without allowlist
| Dimension | jd-daoda | Apollo Debugging | jd-finance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-install decision | |||
Pre-install score | 81 · Manual review | 81 · Manual review | 81 · Manual review |
Score basis | Clear source, High execution risk, Universal | Clear source, High execution risk, OpenClaw | Clear source, High execution risk, Universal |
Execution risk | High | High | High |
Threat tags | unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap | unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap | unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap |
Control gaps | missing license, shell without guardrails, network without allowlist | missing license, shell without guardrails, network without allowlist | missing license, shell without guardrails, network without allowlist |
Permission summary | Network, Command | Network, Command | Network, Command |
Evidence completeness | 63% | 63% | 63% |
| Source & provenance | |||
Provenance | openclaw/skills | openclaw/skills | openclaw/skills |
Category | Vertical & Solutions | Data & Analytics | Vertical & Solutions |
Freshness | |||
| Risk & permission signals | |||
Audit signals | No explicit signals | No explicit signals | No explicit signals |
Permission hints | verify source provenance before install | verify source provenance before install | verify source provenance before install |
| Install & compatibility | |||
Supported tools | Universal | OpenClaw | Universal |
Install method | script-backed | script-backed | script-backed |
Install friction | |||
| Community | |||
Stars | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Repository: openclaw/skills
Author: nic-yuan · Source status: Clear source
Use when about to claim any work is complete, fixed, passing, or successful.
Score basis：Clear source · High execution risk · OpenClaw · Evidence completeness 65%
Repository: openclaw/skills
Author: yixj · Source status: Clear source
A simple solution for: "What's in my house?" and "Where did I put that thing?"
Score basis：Clear source · High execution risk · OpenClaw · Evidence completeness 63%
Repository: openclaw/skills
Author: kenneth-bro · Source status: Clear source
面向A股个股技术面分析，聚焦趋势、均线、MACD、布林带、量能确认与支撑压力结构。基于今日投资金融数据接口，自动识别股票代码并输出结构化技术分析报告。触发词：技术分析、技术面、均线、MACD、布林带、趋势、支撑压力。
Score basis：Clear source · High execution risk · Universal · Evidence completeness 63%
2026-04-02 |
2026-04-03 |
2026-04-02 |
40 |
40 |
40 |
