Bazi Skill
Repository: bazi-skill
Author: jinchenma94 · Source status: Clear source
Chinese-source skill from jinchenma94/bazi-skill.
Score basis:Clear source · Low execution risk · Claude · Evidence completeness 60%
Compare skills
Pick 2–4 skills and compare what really matters: fit, risk, install effort, and community signal.
This comparison came from collection: Lower risk first
Useful for security-sensitive comparisons.
Selected skills (2/4)
Comparison matrix
Highlights show current best; tooltip explains diff/best rules.
Score-basis diff rules / risk tag notes
Start with the matrix. Open this section when you need to understand audit grades, top threats, control gaps, and best-value highlights.
Suggested baseline
Search to add skills, or paste 2–4 comma-separated slugs.
How differences are detected
A row is marked different when selected skills have distinct values. Only-differences mode hides rows that are identical.
How best values are highlighted
Pre-install score, evidence completeness, and community signal prefer higher values; execution risk and install friction prefer lower values.
How to read risk tags
Risk tags come from SAS-v2.1 public-evidence signals and point to command, network, secret, context, or supply-chain items to review before install.
Selected audit signals
jd-affiliate
Execution risk:High
Threat tags:unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap
Control gaps:missing license, shell without guardrails, network without allowlist
jd-daoda
Execution risk:High
Threat tags:unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap
Control gaps:missing license, shell without guardrails, network without allowlist
| Dimension | jd-affiliate | jd-daoda |
|---|---|---|
| Pre-install decision | ||
Pre-install score | 81 · Manual review | 81 · Manual review |
Score basis | Clear source, High execution risk, Universal | Clear source, High execution risk, Universal |
Execution risk | High | High |
Threat tags | unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap | unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap |
Control gaps | missing license, shell without guardrails, network without allowlist | missing license, shell without guardrails, network without allowlist |
Permission summary | Network, Command | Network, Command |
Evidence completeness | 63% | 63% |
| Source & provenance | ||
Provenance | openclaw/skills | openclaw/skills |
Category | Vertical & Solutions | Vertical & Solutions |
Freshness | 2026-04-02 | |
| Risk & permission signals | ||
Audit signals | No explicit signals | No explicit signals |
Permission hints | verify source provenance before install | verify source provenance before install |
| Install & compatibility | ||
Supported tools | Universal | Universal |
Install method | script-backed | script-backed |
Install friction | ||
| Community | ||
Stars | 0 | 0 |
Repository: openclaw/skills
Author: nic-yuan · Source status: Clear source
Use when about to claim any work is complete, fixed, passing, or successful.
Score basis:Clear source · High execution risk · OpenClaw · Evidence completeness 65%
Repository: openclaw/skills
Author: yixj · Source status: Clear source
A simple solution for: "What's in my house?" and "Where did I put that thing?"
Score basis:Clear source · High execution risk · OpenClaw · Evidence completeness 63%
40 |