Compare skills
Pick 2–4 skills and compare what really matters: fit, risk, install effort, and community signal.
This comparison came from collection: Lower risk first
Useful for security-sensitive comparisons.
Comparison matrix
Highlights show current best; tooltip explains diff/best rules.
SAS-v2.1 diff rules / risk tag notes
Start with the matrix. Open this section when you need to understand audit grades, top threats, control gaps, and best-value highlights.
Suggested baseline
Search to add skills, or paste 2–4 comma-separated slugs.
How differences are detected
A row is marked different when selected skills have distinct values. Only-differences mode hides rows that are identical.
How best values are highlighted
Audit score, evidence confidence, trust score, and community signal prefer higher values; execution risk and install friction prefer lower values.
How to read risk tags
Risk tags come from SAS-v2.1 public-evidence signals and point to command, network, secret, context, or supply-chain items to review before install.
Selected audit signals
Apollo Debugging
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap
Control gaps：missing license, shell without guardrails, network without allowlist
jd-cloud
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap
Control gaps：missing license, shell without guardrails, network without allowlist
investoday-stock-technical-analysis
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap
Control gaps：missing license, shell without guardrails, network without allowlist
| Dimension | Apollo Debugging | jd-cloud | investoday-stock-technical-analysis |
|---|---|---|---|
| SAS-v2.1 pre-install audit | |||
Audit grade | C · Review first | C · Review first | C · Review first |
Execution risk | High | High | High |
Threat tags | unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap | unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap | unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap |
Control gaps | missing license, shell without guardrails, network without allowlist | missing license, shell without guardrails, network without allowlist | missing license, shell without guardrails, network without allowlist |
Permission summary | Network, Command | Network, Command | Network, Command |
Evidence confidence | 63% | 63% | 63% |
| Source & provenance | |||
Provenance | openclaw/skills | openclaw/skills | openclaw/skills |
Category | Data & Analytics | Operations & Infra | Data & Analytics |
Freshness | |||
| Risk & trust | |||
Trust score | 81 | 81 | 81 |
Audit signals | |||
| Install & compatibility | |||
Supported tools | OpenClaw | Universal | Universal |
Install method | script-backed | script-backed | script-backed |
Install friction | |||
| Community | |||
Stars | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Repository: openclaw/skills
Author: nic-yuan · Source status: Clear source
Use when about to claim any work is complete, fixed, passing, or successful.
Score basis：Clear source · Low risk signals · OpenClaw
Repository: openclaw/skills
Author: kenneth-bro · Source status: Clear source
面向A股个股财务质量分析，聚焦盈利能力、利润质量、成长持续性、现金流与财务安全性。基于今日投资金融数据接口，自动识别股票代码并输出结构化财务分析报告。触发词：财务分析、盈利能力、现金流、资产负债、偿债能力、利润质量。
Score basis：Clear source · Low risk signals · Universal
2026-04-03 |
2026-04-02 |
2026-03-28 |
No explicit signals |
No explicit signals |
No explicit signals |
Permission hints | verify source provenance before install | verify source provenance before install | verify source provenance before install |
|---|
40 |
40 |
40 |
