Compare skills
Pick 2–4 skills and compare what really matters: fit, risk, install effort, and community signal.
This comparison came from collection: Lower risk first
Useful for security-sensitive comparisons.
Comparison matrix
Highlights show current best; tooltip explains diff/best rules.
Score-basis diff rules / risk tag notes
Start with the matrix. Open this section when you need to understand audit grades, top threats, control gaps, and best-value highlights.
Suggested baseline
Repository: openclaw/skills
Author: nic-yuan · Source status: Clear source
Use when about to claim any work is complete, fixed, passing, or successful.
Score basis：Clear source · High execution risk · OpenClaw · Evidence completeness 65%
Search to add skills, or paste 2–4 comma-separated slugs.
How differences are detected
A row is marked different when selected skills have distinct values. Only-differences mode hides rows that are identical.
How best values are highlighted
Pre-install score, evidence completeness, and community signal prefer higher values; execution risk and install friction prefer lower values.
How to read risk tags
Risk tags come from SAS-v2.1 public-evidence signals and point to command, network, secret, context, or supply-chain items to review before install.
Selected audit signals
Apollo Debugging
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap
Control gaps：missing license, shell without guardrails, network without allowlist
赛博算命 Skill
Execution risk：Low
Threat tags：data exfiltration, supply chain, human approval gap
Control gaps：missing license, missing install docs, broad permissions
What At Home(家里有什么)
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap
Control gaps：missing license, shell without guardrails, network without allowlist
| Dimension | Apollo Debugging | 赛博算命 Skill | What At Home(家里有什么) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-install decision | |||
Pre-install score | 81 · Manual review | 92 · Manual review | 81 · Manual review |
Score basis | Clear source, High execution risk, OpenClaw | Clear source, Low execution risk, Claude | Clear source, High execution risk, OpenClaw |
Execution risk | High | Low | High |
Threat tags | unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap | data exfiltration, supply chain, human approval gap | unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap |
Control gaps | missing license, shell without guardrails, network without allowlist | missing license, missing install docs, broad permissions | missing license, shell without guardrails, network without allowlist |
Permission summary | Network, Command | Network | Network, Command |
Evidence completeness | 63% | 60% | 63% |
| Source & provenance | |||
Provenance | openclaw/skills | jinchenma94/bazi-skill | openclaw/skills |
Category | Data & Analytics | Vertical & Solutions | Knowledge & RAG |
Freshness | |||
| Risk & permission signals | |||
Audit signals | No explicit signals | No explicit signals | No explicit signals |
Permission hints | verify source provenance before install | No explicit hints | verify source provenance before install |
| Install & compatibility | |||
Supported tools | OpenClaw | Claude Code, Claude | OpenClaw |
Install method | script-backed | source-link | script-backed |
Install friction | |||
| Community | |||
Stars | 0 | 986 | 0 |
2026-04-03 |
2026-04-18 |
2026-03-29 |
40 |
62 |
40 |
