Compare skills
Pick 2–4 skills and compare what really matters: fit, risk, install effort, and community signal.
This comparison came from collection: Clear provenance
Useful for excluding unclear provenance early.
Selected skills (2/4)
Comparison matrix
Highlights show current best; tooltip explains diff/best rules.
SAS-v2.1 diff rules / risk tag notes
Start with the matrix. Open this section when you need to understand audit grades, top threats, control gaps, and best-value highlights.
Suggested baseline
Repository: claude-plugins-official
Author: anthropics · Source status: Clear source
This skill should be used when the user asks to "demonstrate skills", "show skill format", "create a skill template", or discusses skill development patterns.
Score basis：Clear source · Low risk signals · Claude
Search to add skills, or paste 2–4 comma-separated slugs.
How differences are detected
A row is marked different when selected skills have distinct values. Only-differences mode hides rows that are identical.
How best values are highlighted
Audit score, evidence confidence, trust score, and community signal prefer higher values; execution risk and install friction prefer lower values.
How to read risk tags
Risk tags come from SAS-v2.1 public-evidence signals and point to command, network, secret, context, or supply-chain items to review before install.
Selected audit signals
develop-ai-functions-example
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：data exfiltration, human approval gap
Control gaps：missing license, network without allowlist, no human approval
gh-fix-ci
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：data exfiltration, memory context poisoning, human approval gap
Control gaps：missing license, network without allowlist, no human approval
| Dimension | develop-ai-functions-example | gh-fix-ci |
|---|---|---|
| SAS-v2.1 pre-install audit | ||
Audit grade | C · Review first | C · Review first |
Execution risk | High | High |
Threat tags | data exfiltration, human approval gap | data exfiltration, memory context poisoning, human approval gap |
Control gaps | missing license, network without allowlist, no human approval | missing license, network without allowlist, no human approval |
Permission summary | Network, Command | Network, Command |
Evidence confidence | 63% | 67% |
| Source & provenance | ||
Provenance | vercel/ai/tree/main/skills/develop-ai-functions-example | openai/skills/tree/main/skills/.curated/gh-fix-ci |
Category | Dev & Engineering | Dev & Engineering |
Freshness | 2026-02-04 | |
| Risk & trust | ||
Trust score | 80 | 80 |
Audit signals | No explicit signals | |
| Install & compatibility | ||
Supported tools | Claude, Codex, Cursor, Universal | Claude, Codex, Cursor, Universal |
Install method | registry-install | registry-install |
Install friction | ||
| Community | ||
Stars | 21.6K | 7.3K |
Repository: knowledge-work-plugins
Author: anthropics · Source status: Clear source
Generate tailored sales assets (landing pages, decks, one-pagers, workflow demos) from your deal context.
Score basis：Clear source · Low risk signals · Claude
Repository: openai/skills
Author: openai · Source status: Clear source
Analyze git repositories to build a security ownership topology (people-to-file), compute bus factor and sensitive-code ownership, and export CSV/JSON for graph databases and visualization.
Score basis：Clear source · Risk needs review · Claude
Permission hints | registry access, remote metadata pull, runtime dependencies may be required | registry access, remote metadata pull, runtime dependencies may be required |
|---|
50 |
